Chess Publisher 2.0 Orgasm II
What is the saying: "Dance like nobody is watching..." but here, it is play because you simply want to play. I believe Blunderprone truly best understands this state of being, the best of all of us...the late night "what if I care?". I don't usually do that, but was tired and didn't want to stop, lossing seven games on time, and don't usually do that].
But since I usually resign lost games (I am that kind of player, and respect most folks and hate stupid games that go on forever that are lost to my opponenent and refuse to do that to others in turn) yet given his skill and rating, had to play it out. I won. Bullet craze (0/4)= usually about 2:45 per side or 5:30 for both sides, to as much as 3:30 or 7:00 for both sides. Without further ado:
7 Comments:
This comment has been removed by the author.
It looks great, gave a great feel for the rapidfire style in those games. Pie throwing, attack, fall back, attack some more, march in the infantry. Fun. That's blitz!
Who's the jerk that deleted his comment before me :)
Maybe your standards are higher than mine, but it's rare that one should be embarrassed by blundering in a blitz game. Isn't it kinda the nature of the beast?
In this case, your judgement of your opponent was justified (in contrast to BDK's Danish game, which was pure stubbornness. At least you had some counterplay)
With such games even a beautiful viewer doesn't help:)
Rxd1+! duh!! groan.
THE THING TO REMEMBE IS THIS: in normal blitz, you CAN have even near the end 1:10 left or 0:40 left, etc.
but in the bullet INCREMENT VARIETY that i play, for 2/3rds of the game, it is possible to have only 12 or 7 seconds per move for every move. and, at times, it is two or three seconds, etc. as forcing sequences accrete, then it builds back, and you can restore the clock to even 0:50 seconds in an ending.
so some of these silly moves, are in this rare case where both players are at that point of 'clocking out;, or THINK THAT THEY ARE.
in many of the bullet games ive shown here, such non-sense is not evident, but, then again, i never showed a bad game so badly scapled....
USUALLY I AM THE ONE GETTING SCALPED, LOSSING MANY A KEEN ADVANTAGE AGAINST ++>>> ELO'S. i cannot tell you how many 'won games' that i have lost. and, these boys are most of them pretty good:
470w/822L/52d= 1,344 games. 34.97% wins, well below my 39.9% at ICC or so, was it.
interestingly, Blunderpone at ICC has the same kind of stats, as I recall. Go George!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!! face them all!!!!!!!
I can't help but to not like the viewer.
i am, de facto, certainly more than open, and
ask if i may, ookwelbekendalsemc, if you can be more specific, my good friend, knowing you have a lot of chess and publication insight alike. i'd appreciate that.
fire away. we are friends. Warmest, dk
Post a Comment
<< Home